Eighteenth Sunday after Pentecost

by the Revd Dr Robert Wilson PhD (Cantab), Old Roman Apostolate UK

In thy tender mercy, direct our hearts, we beseech thee, O Lord, because without thee we are not able to please thee.

Today’s collect asks that God in his tender mercy would direct our hearts, because without him we are not able to please him. The Collects have been described as the jewels of the Roman rite. They express in words that are simple, yet profound and full of meaning, the great truths of our faith. It has been said that they preserve something of the sobriety of classical Roman civilisation, but now in a Christian form. These prayers take us back to the Rome of the age of Leo the Great, of Gelasius and Gregory, when the Roman Empire was breaking down in the West and the Church proved to be the only instrument of continuity at a time when society seemed to have collapsed. As the Roman rite spread outwards from the city of Rome to other parts of Europe they became the prayers of western Christendom. Sunday by Sunday, week by week, for well over a thousand years, in some cases one thousand five hundred years, they have formed the basis of the Church’s prayer. Those who joined in the prayers of the Church knew that God in his tender mercy would in all things direct their hearts, for as much as without him they were not able to please him. These prayers formed the basis of the spiritual lives of the saints, of members of the religious orders, of the clergy and the laity. Whatever their differing personalities, levels of education and spiritual insight, they expressed their faith through these prayers. 

But, we might say, that what then, but now we are all children of the Enlightenment and know better. Are not those who are still using and praying in this way stuck in the past? Surely we now know that we no longer need to ask for divine grace to help and guide us day by day, but can achieve all we desire through our own efforts. Whereas classical Christianity taught us to look outside ourselves to God, who created us in his own image, who came to us in the midst of time in the person of Jesus Christ, and will judge us at the end of time, the Enlightenment repudiated this faith as an antiquated superstition. History was now seen to come to a climax not in the events of the life, death and resurrection of Jesus in first century Palestine, but in eighteenth century Europe. Through the application of reason and science the human race could finally achieve all that was needed to improve the world. A civilised, but non religious humanity would succeed where the earlier ages of faith had failed. The classical faith of the Church was now seen as out of date and out of line. There was no need to look to any kind of supernatural purpose behind the world, but rather to a purposive progress within it as societies shook off the antiquated faith of the Church that had kept them in bondage to the past. There was a need to be optimistic about what human beings could achieve and no need for the pessimism of prayers like today’s collect that without divine grace we can achieve nothing.

In more recent times the optimism of the age of the Enlightenment has faded. We are now told that we live in a post-modern age. Whereas the philosophy of post-Enlightenment western man sought to replace belief in classical Christianity with faith in reason and science, we are now taught that this too was an illusion. Those who claimed to be objectively describing the world were simply engaged in a power game to control it. There is no such thing as objective truth, but rather each person creates his or her own truth, which is whatever they feel at a given time. Even whether they are male or female is not a given reality, but something that they can create for themselves. It is heavily ironic that the descendants of those who sought to replace the Christian faith with belief in reason and science have now abandoned not only Christianity, but reason and science as well. We are more conscious than our Enlightenment predecessors of the darker side of humanity, but we are now left with no overall vision and no hope. We lurch from crisis to crisis, there are wars and rumours of wars, diseases and changes to the climate, but we lack any coherent faith to guide us forward. 

In fact our situation is not so very different from the age in which the prayers of the Roman rite were written. The classical civilisation of Rome that had thought it would last for ever had decayed, there were incursions of barbarian tribes, plagues and changes to the climate. But in that age people prayed. They prayed through the prayers of the liturgy that we are still using today. They knew that without God they were not able to please him and prayed that he would direct and rule their hearts.  Their prayers and their labours were not in vain. Over time the barbarian tribal kingdoms that replaced the Roman empire in the west were Christianised and the so called Dark Ages was also an age of saints.  The rulers of the tribal kingdoms saw (however inadequately in practice) that the Church possessed something that they did not have, a faith that the human race, though fallen and sinful, could be redeemed and restored by divine grace.

We face an analogous situation today. The age of Enlightenment has run out of steam. A naive and superficial faith in human progress has been replaced by cynicism, apathy and despair. It is the Christian faith that provides the answer to our problems, that enables us to avoid the extremes of an unrealistic optimism about human progress that ignores the darker side of human nature, or a despairing resignation that abandons any search for truth and meaning beyond ourselves. The Christian faith teaches us that there is ultimate meaning and purpose, but the human race has fallen and is sinful. We have no power of ourselves to help ourselves and we need to ask for divine grace to enable us to think, will and do what is good. It is not, as G. K. Chesterton put it, the Church that will lead us back to the dark ages, the Church is the only thing that got us out of them.

Let us make today’s collect our own and pray that God in his mercy will direct our hearts, for as much as without him we are not able to please him.he bond of peace.


LATEST ARTICLES


  • Today’s Mass: September 09 Day II in the Octave of The Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary
    The feast of Our Lady’s Nativity, of ancient Eastern origin and established at Rome by the time of Pope St Sergius I, celebrates Mary as the immaculate New Eve and the dawn of salvation, the chosen tabernacle from whom the Redeemer would take His flesh. Today the Church also commemorates St Gorgonius, an officer of the imperial household at Nicomedia who, with his companion Dorotheus, embraced the Faith and suffered martyrdom under Diocletian in A.D. 303; his relics were later translated to Rome.
  • NOMEN MANET, RES DEEST ~ The Name Remains; the Reality Is Lacking: Spiritual Conference for Nuntiatoria CXXII
    The content emphasises the disconnect between the names associated with Catholicism and the actual practices of faith. It highlights the importance of embodying belief through genuine actions, urging self-examination rather than mere external observance. Ultimately, it advocates for a restoration of sincerity in faith, calling individuals to authentically reflect their beliefs through their lives and worship.
  • Mary Is Co-Redemptrix: Cardinal Burke Reopens Rome’s Marian Controversy
    Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke has declared the Virgin Mary as “Co-Redemptrix” amidst controversy over the Vatican’s restriction on this title. The debate revolves around the appropriateness of certain theological language and whether terminology historically used can still accurately express Marian cooperation in Redemption without compromising Christ’s unique role.
  • When Politics Defines Doctrine: Edmund Waldstein, Integralism and the New Boundary at Heiligenkreuz
    The ongoing exclusion of Father Edmund Waldstein from teaching at Heiligenkreuz has sparked debate on the limits of acceptable Catholic thought, particularly regarding integralism and its relationship to Church doctrine. Critics argue that Waldstein and similar positions challenge both Catholic teachings and democratic values, raising questions about the intersection of faith and politics.
  • Christianity Is Right ~ Not Right Wing
    The article discusses the distinction between Catholic orthodoxy and modern political ideologies, particularly the Right and Christian nationalism. It argues that Catholic beliefs about family, morality, and authority predate contemporary political classifications and should not be conflated with right-wing politics. The ordo amoris framework is presented as a guiding principle for evaluating political alliances while maintaining a focus on the common good and the Social Kingship of Christ.

LITURGY



Leave a Reply

Trending

Discover more from NUNTIATORIA

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading