Ninety-One Monasteries Closed: The Liturgical Divide in France’s Vocational Collapse
A new study records the disappearance of almost a third of France’s contemplative monasteries in less than twenty years. The losses are severe among Carmelite, Poor Clare and Trappist houses, yet none of the monasteries whose Divine Office was celebrated exclusively in Latin in 2007 has closed. The finding does not make Latin a statistical talisman. It does expose the failure of an ecclesiastical culture which spent decades weakening the distinctive inheritance by which the monastic vocation was made intelligible.
On 21 July, the French Catholic weekly La Vie published the findings of a study by Isabelle Jonveaux, a sociologist specialising in contemporary monastic life at the University of Fribourg. Starting with the 303 Catholic contemplative monasteries listed by the Fondation des Monastères in 2007, Jonveaux traced what had happened to them during the years since. Ninety-one had closed. France has lost almost 30 per cent of its contemplative houses in less than two decades.¹
The pace is increasing. Before 2015, fewer than four monasteries closed each year on average. The present rate is approximately ten. Women’s communities have been hit particularly hard: 32 per cent of the female monasteries in the study have disappeared, compared with 21 per cent of the male houses. Thirty-four of the eighty-five Carmels listed in 2007 have closed. The Poor Clares have lost roughly 40 per cent of their houses, the Visitation 30 per cent and the Trappists 36.4 per cent. Dominican contemplatives, with a closure rate of 8 per cent, and Benedictines, men and women combined, at 18 per cent, have proved more resilient.¹
The raw figures give documentary scale to a collapse which had previously been encountered piecemeal: a departure announced here, a final Mass celebrated there, a historic abbey transferred to a charitable foundation or converted into accommodation, conference facilities and a heritage attraction. One house could always be explained by the age of its members, another by the cost of maintaining its buildings and a third by some local failure of recruitment. Ninety-one closures can no longer be dismissed as a collection of unfortunate accidents.
The examples used to introduce the study require some chronological precision. Notre-Dame du Port-du-Salut did not close in 2026: the last Trappist monks left in October 2025. The abbey now houses a lay-led project involving hospitality, tourism, vocational training and support for families, while the diocese searches for some future religious presence. The project may preserve the buildings and accomplish worthwhile work, but the monastic community which prayed there from 1815 has gone.²
The Carmelites of Compiègne, living at Jonquières since 1992, announced in April 2026 that their six remaining sisters would leave progressively during the following months. The community bears the name and inheritance of the sixteen Carmelites guillotined in Paris on 17 July 1794. Those martyrs renewed their vows before their execution and approached the scaffold singing. The house which survived the Terror has now reached its end through age, diminishing numbers and the absence of successors.³
The monks of Notre-Dame de La Trappe have not yet departed. In March they announced that they envisage leaving their historic abbey in 2028 because their small community can no longer maintain the immense property. La Trappe gave its name to the Trappist observance. It survived the Revolution through exile and restoration; its present difficulty is quieter. The reforming centre which once sent its form of life across continents can no longer generate enough vocations to occupy its own cloister.⁴
Nuntiatoria has already considered these losses as symptoms of a wider anthropological and ecclesial change. The difficulty is not confined to persuading a sufficient number of young Catholics to enter monasteries. The deeper failure lies in presenting monastic renunciation as a reasonable response to the truth about God, man and eternity. A life of enclosure, silence, chastity, poverty and obedience will appear absurd when religious language itself has come to emphasise personal fulfilment, dialogue, social usefulness and therapeutic wellbeing. The cloister becomes intelligible only when God is recognised as the final end for whom everything else may rightly be surrendered.⁵
Jonveaux’s most arresting finding now introduces a measurable liturgical distinction into that argument.
Of the 303 monasteries studied, 244 celebrated the Divine Office in French in 2007. Thirty-six used a mixture of French and Latin. Twenty-three used Latin exclusively. During the following years, 34 per cent of the French-language houses closed. Among the monasteries using both languages, the closure rate fell to 19 per cent. Among the twenty-three communities whose Office was entirely in Latin, it was zero.¹
The Latin category includes monasteries following the reformed liturgy as well as those using older books. Solesmes and houses formed within its liturgical tradition cannot simply be classified as traditionalist communities in the contemporary polemical sense. The finding therefore concerns something broader than attachment to the pre-conciliar Roman rite. It concerns the preservation of Latin as the normal language of the Church’s public prayer, together with the musical, disciplinary and theological culture which commonly accompanies it.
Twenty-three houses are not enough to establish a universal law. The study, as presently reported, does not control for the age of the communities, the number of members they possessed in 2007, their financial position, the strength of their associated congregations, their geographical location or the proportion of entrants received during the period. Latin may not operate as an independent cause. Its retention may instead identify monasteries which have also preserved stronger government, more demanding formation, common observance, enclosure, Gregorian chant, visible habits and confidence in the objective purpose of the religious life.
That qualification does not weaken the ecclesial importance of the result. It clarifies it.
Latin is not a charm against demographic decline. It belongs to a whole understanding of the monastery as something received rather than invented by its present occupants. The monk enters a language he did not devise, chants melodies he is not free to refashion, submits himself to hours established before his birth and joins a prayer extending far beyond the tastes of the existing community. The Office teaches him, repeatedly and bodily, that the monastery is not a platform for his personality. Its life was there before him and, God willing, will continue after him.
This disposition is close to the substance of monastic obedience. It is also profoundly opposed to the expressive individualism of the modern West. A culture organised around autonomy, choice, self-definition and the indefinite revision of personal commitments will naturally struggle to produce men and women prepared to take irrevocable vows. Religious communities do not overcome that culture by reproducing its assumptions within the cloister. They offer an alternative only by remaining recognisably different from it.
This is the contrast which many religious institutes deliberately reduced after the Council. Habits were modified or discarded, enclosure relaxed, common prayer abbreviated, silence diminished and inherited customs subjected to constant reconsideration. The language of sacrifice was frequently displaced by that of self-development. Obedience became consultation; asceticism became psychological balance; the superior became a facilitator; the monastery acquired projects, committees and mission statements while the choir stalls emptied.
Some adaptation was prudent and some abuses undoubtedly required correction. Yet a reform which makes religious life less recognisable also makes it less compelling. Young Catholics are not likely to abandon marriage, property, professional advancement and personal independence in order to join an ageing committee devoted to values which can be pursued without vows. They may, however, surrender those goods for a life which speaks plainly of God, eternity, sacrifice and the salvation of souls.
This was the argument made in Nuntiatoria’s examination of “Christianity without contrast”. Religious institutes which blur the boundaries between consecrated life and secular humanitarian work lose the very distinctiveness capable of sustaining costly commitment. Clear identity, common discipline and visible separation are not sociological embarrassments. They help a community to transmit its purpose from one generation to the next.⁶ Jonveaux’s figures now provide striking French evidence of that principle.
The contrast can also be observed where monastic life is returning rather than disappearing. In February, the Benedictines of Mary, Queen of Apostles established themselves at Colwich Abbey in Staffordshire. The community is known for traditional Benedictine observance, enclosure, sacred music, Eucharistic devotion and loyalty to the Divine Office. It possesses enough young vocations to cross the Atlantic and revive an English abbey whose previous community could no longer continue there. The sisters did not achieve this by suppressing the features which distinguish a nun from a lay professional. Their growth arose from offering a form of life whose supernatural purpose is difficult to mistake.⁷
Colwich does not prove that every traditional foundation will prosper, any more than one closure proves that every reformed community must fail. It does show that Western secularisation has not made contemplative vocations impossible. Young women raised in the same individualistic culture which supposedly renders the cloister incomprehensible are still entering enclosed communities. They tend to choose those which make a definite demand and possess a definite identity.
The elderly sisters of Goldenstein in Austria provided a different illustration when, after being moved to a nursing facility, they returned to their convent in September 2025. Their case involved difficult questions of property, care, authority and obedience, and should not be sentimentalised. Yet their determination revealed something often missed by administrators: a convent is not interchangeable with sheltered accommodation. Stability is part of the vowed life. The house is the place where the religious has promised to seek God, to observe her rule and ordinarily to die. To regard it chiefly as a burdensome building occupied by elderly women is already to have forgotten what a monastery is.⁸
The buildings matter because of the life they shelter, but preserving masonry is not the same as preserving monasticism. Port-du-Salut may remain open to tourists. Its shop, training centre and family programmes may flourish. None of these activities replaces the night Office, the conventual Mass, the silence of the cloister or the daily offering of lives consecrated entirely to God. A chapel available for visitors is not equivalent to a choir filled at Matins.
Nuntiatoria has called monasteries the “engines of grace” because their apparent inactivity conceals the work most proper to the Church: adoration, intercession, penance and praise. Their decline consequently damages more than the religious orders concerned. Parishes, missions, families and clergy lose the hidden support of communities whose whole existence is offered for the sanctification of the Church. A diocese which allows its contemplative life to disappear may retain offices, pastoral plans and lay programmes, but something essential has fallen silent.⁹
The Second Vatican Council cannot honestly be invoked as requiring that silence. Sacrosanctum Concilium directed that clerics should retain Latin in the Divine Office, subject to defined exceptions, and assigned Gregorian chant pride of place in the Roman liturgy. Perfectae Caritatis required institutes to return to the sources of Christian life, the original inspiration of their founders and the sound traditions constituting their patrimony. It also affirmed that communities wholly devoted to contemplation retain a distinguished place in the Mystical Body.¹⁰ The abandonment of Latin, chant, enclosure and inherited observance was not imposed in the terms now commonly supposed. Much of it resulted from later choices and from an ecclesiastical atmosphere in which continuity was presumed to impede renewal.
Jonveaux’s study should prompt more than regret. The Holy See and the French episcopate should examine why the closure rate differs so sharply according to liturgical language and associated observance. The monasteries in each category should be compared by foundation date, age profile, recruitment, retention, common discipline and liturgical practice. Houses receiving vocations should be studied without ideological suspicion. Their ability to assume threatened monasteries should be facilitated rather than obstructed.
Above all, the familiar policy must be reversed. For decades, communities attached to inherited forms have been instructed to prove their openness, moderation and conformity to a model which has produced widespread institutional death. The figures suggest that questions should now be addressed in the opposite direction. Why have communities which abandoned so much of their patrimony failed to attract successors? Why are viable traditional foundations sometimes denied buildings while empty monasteries are transferred to secular purposes? Why is liturgical continuity treated as a pastoral difficulty when it is so conspicuously associated with survival?
One should not claim more than the evidence supports. Latin alone did not save the twenty-three monasteries, and French alone did not destroy the others. Yet the difference between zero and 34 per cent cannot responsibly be treated as meaningless. It points towards an ecology of fidelity in which language, chant, doctrine, habit, enclosure, authority and ascetic practice reinforce one another. Remove enough of those elements and the life ceases to reproduce itself. Preserve them with intelligence and charity, and the vocation remains comprehensible even to men and women formed by the twenty-first century.
The ninety-one closed monasteries represent more than lost buildings. Each marks the interruption of a particular succession of prayer: psalms no longer sung, Masses no longer offered, bells no longer summoning a community to the praise of God. France has endured such silences before, imposed by revolutionaries who expelled religious and confiscated their houses. The present extinction is more difficult to confront because it has proceeded under ecclesiastical management, accompanied by expressions of gratitude, carefully planned farewell ceremonies and promises that the buildings will retain a spiritual character.
There is still another course. Colwich demonstrates that an old abbey may receive new life. The Latin houses in Jonveaux’s study demonstrate that inherited worship need not lead to extinction. The first task is to abandon the conceit that the forms most closely connected with the Church’s monastic memory are obstacles to her future. They may be among the few remaining means by which that future can be secured.
- Sixtine Chartier, interview with Isabelle Jonveaux, “‘Il y a une accélération des fermetures de monastères’: une étude inédite dresse un état des lieux pour la France”, La Vie, 21 July 2026, updated 22 July 2026. The study used the Fondation des Monastères catalogue of 2007 and concerned Catholic contemplative monasteries rather than apostolic congregations.
- Notre-Dame du Port-du-Salut, official account of the departure of the last monks in October 2025 and the subsequent lay and diocesan project for the property.
- Diocese of Beauvais, “Fermeture du Carmel de Jonquières”, 21 April 2026; Nuntiatoria, “The Extinction of the Cloister: Compiègne, La Trappe, and Mount Melleray as Signs of an Anthropological Crisis in the Church”, 1 May 2026.
- Nuntiatoria, “The Silence of La Trappe: Monastic Decline and the Anthropological Turn in the Post-Conciliar Church”, 11 March 2026. The monks’ departure is envisaged for 2028 and had not taken place when Jonveaux’s findings were published.
- Nuntiatoria, “The Extinction of the Cloister”, especially its treatment of the contemplative vocation as a life ordered to man’s transcendent end.
- Nuntiatoria, “Christianity Without Contrast: Vocational Decline in the West and the Adoption of the Zeitgeist”, 11 February 2026; Laurence R. Iannaccone, “Why Strict Churches Are Strong”, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 99, no. 5, 1994, pp. 1180–1211.
- Nuntiatoria, “A Benedictine Return to Colwich: Exile, Martyrdom, and the Long Memory of English Catholicism”, 27 February 2026.
- Nuntiatoria, “Elderly Nuns Defy Nursing Home Order, Return to Goldenstein Convent”, 29 September 2025.
- Nuntiatoria, “Engines of Grace: Why the Church’s Beating Heart Has Fallen Silent”, 15 August 2025.
- Second Vatican Council, Sacrosanctum Concilium, arts 101 and 116; Perfectae Caritatis, arts 2 and 7; Pius XII, Sponsa Christi, 21 November 1950.
RELATED ARTiCLES
LATEST ARTICLES
- Today’s Mass: September 10 St Nicholas of TolentinoSaint Nicholas of Tolentino, born around 1246 in Italy, became a devout Augustinian hermit known for his piety and dedication to preaching. He spent his later years in Tolentino, promoting virtue, and maintaining his chastity until his death in 1306. Canonised in 1446, his tomb is revered by the faithful.
- Today’s Mass: September 09 Day II in the Octave of The Nativity of the Blessed Virgin MaryThe feast of Our Lady’s Nativity, of ancient Eastern origin and established at Rome by the time of Pope St Sergius I, celebrates Mary as the immaculate New Eve and the dawn of salvation, the chosen tabernacle from whom the Redeemer would take His flesh. Today the Church also commemorates St Gorgonius, an officer of the imperial household at Nicomedia who, with his companion Dorotheus, embraced the Faith and suffered martyrdom under Diocletian in A.D. 303; his relics were later translated to Rome.
- NOMEN MANET, RES DEEST ~ The Name Remains; the Reality Is Lacking: Spiritual Conference for Nuntiatoria CXXIIThe content emphasises the disconnect between the names associated with Catholicism and the actual practices of faith. It highlights the importance of embodying belief through genuine actions, urging self-examination rather than mere external observance. Ultimately, it advocates for a restoration of sincerity in faith, calling individuals to authentically reflect their beliefs through their lives and worship.
- Mary Is Co-Redemptrix: Cardinal Burke Reopens Rome’s Marian ControversyCardinal Raymond Leo Burke has declared the Virgin Mary as “Co-Redemptrix” amidst controversy over the Vatican’s restriction on this title. The debate revolves around the appropriateness of certain theological language and whether terminology historically used can still accurately express Marian cooperation in Redemption without compromising Christ’s unique role.
- When Politics Defines Doctrine: Edmund Waldstein, Integralism and the New Boundary at HeiligenkreuzThe ongoing exclusion of Father Edmund Waldstein from teaching at Heiligenkreuz has sparked debate on the limits of acceptable Catholic thought, particularly regarding integralism and its relationship to Church doctrine. Critics argue that Waldstein and similar positions challenge both Catholic teachings and democratic values, raising questions about the intersection of faith and politics.
CURRENT EDITION
DAILY MASS ONLINE
One of the earliest online apostolates dedicated to the Traditional Latin Mass, Old Roman TV began broadcasting the Holy Sacrifice on the Feast of the Assumption, 15 August 2008. During the COVID-19 pandemic, additional programming — devotions, catechesis, and conferences — was added to support the faithful in prayer and formation.
Support the daily Holy Mass on Old Roman TV by offering a Mass intention — for loved ones, thanksgiving, or the repose of souls. Your intention helps sustain the sacred liturgy and brings grace to those you remember before God’s altar.
SUPPORT THE DAILY MASS ONLINE
Likely the world’s longest-running daily online broadcast of the
Traditional Latin Mass, streaming faithfully since the
Feast of the Assumption 2008.
This apostolate cannot continue without immediate help
Please support us with a contribution toward
chapel rent, sacristy supplies, operating costs, and web-hosting.
Our essential monthly costs reach £1,000.
MASS INTENTIONS
If your offering is for a Mass Intention, kindly complete the form below in full so we may correctly match it to your donation. For anniversary intentions — birthdays, wedding anniversaries, anniversaries of death — please be sure to include the relevant date.
Today’s Mass Propers
- Today’s Mass: September 10 St Nicholas of Tolentino
Saint Nicholas of Tolentino, born around 1246 in Italy, became a devout Augustinian hermit known for his piety and dedication to preaching. He spent his later years in Tolentino, promoting virtue, and maintaining his chastity until his death in 1306. Canonised in 1446, his tomb is revered by the faithful.
Leave a Reply